According to a court document filed at the Milimani Law Courts in Nairobi, Burale is seeking Ksh 20 million in compensation for damages to his reputation.
The High Court, led by Justice Stephen Onjoro, has since certified the case as urgent and directed that the defendants be served immediately. The hearing has been scheduled for October 23, 2025.
The dispute stems from a video interview shared on Alex Mwakideu’s YouTube channel, where Rozina opened up about her past marriage to Burale.
The dispute stems from a video interview shared on Alex Mwakideu’s YouTube channel, where Rozina opened up about her past marriage to Burale.
In the emotional discussion, Rozina described their one-year union as the “darkest period” of her life, claiming she endured emotional neglect and financial struggles during their time together.
She also alleged that she discovered troubling information from Burale’s personal emails, which worsened their situation.
The video, which has since gone viral with over 650,000 views, sparked widespread reactions online. While some sympathized with Rozina, others accused the Mwakideus of tarnishing Burale’s name.
In his petition, Burale insists the allegations were false and malicious, claiming they were made deliberately to destroy his image and career.
The video, which has since gone viral with over 650,000 views, sparked widespread reactions online. While some sympathized with Rozina, others accused the Mwakideus of tarnishing Burale’s name.
In his petition, Burale insists the allegations were false and malicious, claiming they were made deliberately to destroy his image and career.
He further accused Alex of professional negligence for failing to verify the accuracy of his sister’s statements before publishing the interview.
Burale now wants the court to compel the two to delete the video from YouTube and issue a public apology.
Burale now wants the court to compel the two to delete the video from YouTube and issue a public apology.
He has also requested an injunction to stop the public from reposting or sharing the video or any related content.
“Pending the hearing and determination of this case, the respondents are prohibited from publishing or circulating any form of content related to the defamatory video,” part of Burale’s court application reads.
“Pending the hearing and determination of this case, the respondents are prohibited from publishing or circulating any form of content related to the defamatory video,” part of Burale’s court application reads.
Post a Comment
0Comments